1. Markup: leave it, don't chase it
The rule
Don't add FAQPage markup to chase AI visibility. If your platform or plugin already emits it and it matches the visible text, leave it. Spend the effort on the visible text.
Why it works
- Google ended the display. Its documentation changelog says: "This feature will no longer appear in Google Search starting May 7, 2026."
- Google said unused markup does no harm in Search. "Structured data that's not being used does not cause problems for Search, but also has no visible effects in Google Search." So leaving it costs nothing in Search. Google says nothing there about AI answers.
- The two strongest designs find no lift from markup. One large citation model reports schema with "no significant independent effect detected in this sample." The same agency's summary still lists schema among the items that "produce measurable citation lift," so its headline reads warmer than its model. An SEO software vendor's matched study of 1,885 pages that added JSON-LD of any type, against 4,000 controls, found a small but significant 4.6% decline on Google AI Overviews, which its authors say they "can't clearly attribute to schema," and gains indistinguishable from zero on AI Mode and ChatGPT. It looked at pages already cited by AI, over 30 days. Neither was FAQ-specific, and the matched study measured adding markup, not removing it.
- The claims that it helps come from sellers. Two WordPress SEO plugins make the case for their FAQ blocks, and neither page backs its claim with a measurement. Two weaker designs do report markup adding something, one resting on 23 pages and one with no table. That's why I call markup's AI benefit unsupported, not disproven.
How to do it
- Keep existing markup if it already matches the visible text.
- Don't build new FAQPage markup, and don't score it.